Correct calculations throughout.Ī4-Has all required elements. Understanding of transformations of graphs and exponentials/natural logarithms (commensurate with syllabus) clearly demonstrated. Reflects on possible reasons for discrepancies between model and real-life data and considers ways to analyse this.Į6-Good initial analysis of results. Reflects on degree of accuracy of results. Looks for different ways to explore problem.ĭ3-Reflects on nature of problem. Comparison of different approaches to produce models. Misuse of words “scatter graph”, “constants”. Variables clearly defined.Ĭ3-Application of area of mathematical interest to real-life situation. Labels on axes not always clear but appropriate graphs throughout. Returns to original question at end to fulfil aim – complete.ī2-Tables displaying data and units and clear. Coherent work through transformations required to obtain model. Clear aim (although the student does stray from it slightly). Without this information, it may not be clear to others that the student was engaged and understood the work.Ī4-Brief aim. This information provided by the teacher justifies the levels awarded. Having supervised the student throughout the process, I can confirm that the student was very engaged with the task and all the work produced is her own.” She taught herself how to separate algebraic fractions into partial fractions, which helped her to find the solution she was after. Once research had started, the student developed differential equations to explain rainfall, but soon found out that she did not have enough knowledge to solve one of the equations. “The student was interested in the stimulus ‘weather’ and said that she wanted to look into rainfall and to see whether this could be extended to other falling objects. Accuracy errors are not penalized given the level of understanding demonstrated. E6-Thorough knowledge and understanding have been demonstrated. D2-The reflection is meaningful, but not critical. C3-The student has created some examples. B2-There are many notation errors, but not enough to award only a level 1. Comments A3-Although the communication is good, it is not concise enough for a level 4.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |